» Analyzing Smith’s Rule of Thirds Statement
  • Shallow vs Deep DOF: Storytelling in Photography
    #503 Welcome back everyone, thanks for joining in today! I appreciate all of the amazing support! We’re going to be looking at depth of field and how your f/stop can help or hinder your storytelling. This article is great for beginners or professionals because it’s widely being taught that bokeh is a necessity, rather than […]

Analyzing Smith’s Rule of Thirds Statement



By now you should be able to see some flaws in Smith’s painting. No arabesque, GAC is confused by two other bright points…I will stop there. But, he did in-fact hold true to his rule of thirds statement…look at that leg, perfectly lined up on the left third. Bravo! Just please, don’t follow his example.


So, why was design taken out to the forest, shot and left for dead? To simplify things? If that’s true, then shame on us.  I don’t think Smith’s intentions were to have the rule of thirds become a watered down version for design, but he definitely got the ball rolling. I can’t blame him for trying to help others and better their compositions though. It’s likely no one was there to teach him the ways of design. Some things can be simplified and come out better in a result, like the invention of microwavable popcorn or the dishwasher, but artistic composition shouldn’t have been one of them.

“Design was kept a secret, and the rule of thirds was praised by the Gods of oversimplified mediocrity”

This content is for The Master Pass members only.
Log In Register

IPOX studios, LLC - Canon of Design - Copyright 2018. All Rights Reserved. Up
Peter Lippmann – ANALYZED PHOTO
The Simplicity & Beauty of Dynamic Symmetry – Visual Glossary